Skip to main content
Justice

US judge reneged on promise in Roman Polanski sex case, transcript reveals

A Los Angeles judge privately told lawyers he would renege on a promise and imprison Roman Polanski for having sex with a teenage girl in 1977, a former prosecutor has testified. This in part explains why the renowned Franco-Polish director fled the Unites States, setting the stage for one of America's longest running legal sagas.

A Los Angeles judge privately told lawyers he would renege on a promise and imprison Roman Polanski for having sex with a teenage girl in 1977.
A Los Angeles judge privately told lawyers he would renege on a promise and imprison Roman Polanski for having sex with a teenage girl in 1977. AFP/File
Advertising

A previously sealed transcript obtained by The Associated Press late Sunday of testimony by retired Deputy District Attorney Roger Gunson supports Polanski’s claim that he fled on the eve of sentencing in 1978 because he didn’t think he was getting a fair deal.

Gunson said during closed-door testimony in 2010 that the judge broke a promise to let Polanski go free after state prison officials had determined he shouldn't serve hard time.

“The judge had promised him on two occasions ... something that he reneged on,” Gunson said. “So it wasn’t surprising to me that, when he was told he was going to be sent off to state prison ... that he could not or would not trust the judge.”

Defense lawyer Harland Braun said Friday — in expectation of the transcript's release — that the development would renew his effort to have Polanski sentenced in absentia, which would end his status as a fugitive from justice.

Braun has unsuccessfully tried that before with prosecutors asserting and judges agreeing that Polanski needs to show up in Los Angeles Superior Court to resolve the matter.

Release of the transcript, which was ordered by a California appeals court Wednesday after Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón dropped longstanding objections his predecessors made to its release, may support Polanski's claims that he was going to be railroaded by a corrupt judge.

Catherine Deneuve with Roman Polanski at the 2017 Cannes Film Festival.
Catherine Deneuve with Roman Polanski at the 2017 Cannes Film Festival. AFP/Archivos

The legal saga has played on both sides of the Atlantic as a recurring scene over four decades of a life marred by tragedy and also triumph.

Born in Paris, Polanski spent time as a child with his father's Jewish family in Poland. He managed to escape the Krakow ghetto where Jews were rounded up during the second world war.

His wife, Sharon Tate, was among the seven people murdered in 1969 by followers of Charles Manson.

Polanski, 88, who was nominated for Oscars for 1974′s “Chinatown” and 1979′s “Tess,” won the best director statuette for “The Pianist” in 2003. But he wasn't able to accept it because he faces arrest in the US.

France, Switzerland and Poland rejected bids to extradite him back to the United States and he continues to be feted in Europe, winning praise and working with major actors. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, however, expelled him from its membership in 2018 after the “MeToo” movement spurred a reckoning about sexual misconduct.

Feminist activists hold a banner reading "Polanski: Best rapist 2020 award" during a demonstration outside the Salle Pleyel in Paris as guests arrive for the 45th edition of the Cesar Film Awards ceremony on February 28, 2020. - The academy organising France's Cesar awards is going through a crisis after the entire board resigned amid calls for reform and a row over the long-running Roman Polanski scandal. The Cesar Academy has been under fire since the end of January after Roman Polanski's film "An Officer and a Spy" (J'accuse) topped the list of nominations for this year's Cesar awards, due to be handed out on February 28. Polanski told AFP on February 27, 2020,  he would not attend the ceremony French Oscars because he fears a "public lynching" by feminist activists.
Feminist activists hold a banner reading "Polanski: Best rapist 2020 award" during a demonstration outside the Salle Pleyel in Paris as guests arrive for the 45th edition of the Cesar Film Awards ceremony on February 28, 2020. - The academy organising France's Cesar awards is going through a crisis after the entire board resigned amid calls for reform and a row over the long-running Roman Polanski scandal. The Cesar Academy has been under fire since the end of January after Roman Polanski's film "An Officer and a Spy" (J'accuse) topped the list of nominations for this year's Cesar awards, due to be handed out on February 28. Polanski told AFP on February 27, 2020, he would not attend the ceremony French Oscars because he fears a "public lynching" by feminist activists. AFP - LUCAS BARIOULET

Polanski’s 13-year-old victim testified before a grand jury that during a photo shoot at Jack Nicholson’s house in March 1977 when the actor wasn’t home, Polanski gave her champagne and part of a sedative, then forced her to have sex. The girl said she didn’t fight him because she was afraid of him but her mother later called police.

When the girl refused to testify in court, Polanski pleaded guilty to unlawful sex with a minor in exchange for prosecutors dropping drug, rape and sodomy charges.

Polanski has argued that there was judicial misconduct in his case. In 2010, a Los Angeles court took sealed testimony from Gunson about his recollections of promises made to the director by the judge in 1977.

Polanski’s lawyers, who were in the room during Gunson's testimony but couldn't use it in court, have long sought to unseal that transcript to help their case.

This handout photo taken and released on October 15, 2020 by KRK Film shows Polish-French film director Roman Polanski (L) attending a ceremony in the southern Polish city of Gliwice to honour the late Polish couple, Stefania and Jan Buchala, who hid him from the Nazis during World War II, in the presence of their grandson Stanislaw Buchala (R). - Roman Polanski revisits the "horror" of his Holocaust childhood in a new documentary that premiered on May 30, 2021 in the controversial Oscar-winning director's Polish hometown of Krakow.
This handout photo taken and released on October 15, 2020 by KRK Film shows Polish-French film director Roman Polanski (L) attending a ceremony in the southern Polish city of Gliwice to honour the late Polish couple, Stefania and Jan Buchala, who hid him from the Nazis during World War II, in the presence of their grandson Stanislaw Buchala (R). - Roman Polanski revisits the "horror" of his Holocaust childhood in a new documentary that premiered on May 30, 2021 in the controversial Oscar-winning director's Polish hometown of Krakow. AFP - SEBASTIAN PRZYBYLSKI

Judge Laurence Rittenband, now deceased, had been swayed by publicity in the case and changed his mind several times about the punishment Polanski should face, Braun said.

After a report by probation officials that Polanski should serve no time behind bars, Rittenband sent the director to state prison for a 90-day diagnostic evaluation to help determine what punishment he should face.

The judge said that as long as Polanski received a favorable report from the prison, he would serve no additional time, Gunson said.

Only probation?

After six weeks of evaluation in prison, Polanski was released with a recommendation he only serve probation, Braun said.

But Rittenband thought the probation and prison reports were superficial and a “whitewash," said Gunson, who agreed they downplayed or misstated Polanski's crimes.

The judge privately told Gunson and Polanski's lawyer that he had to be tougher because of criticism in the news media.

He said he would send Polanski to prison for a longer term but would then get him released within 120 days, which was possible under sentencing rules at the time.

“Roman says, ‘How can I trust the judge that’s lied twice?’ So he takes off to Europe,” Braun said.

Gunson acknowledged during his testimony that the judge had discretion to sentence Polanski up to 50 years because there had been no agreed-upon sentence. But Gunson objected to the “sham” proceedings the judge was orchestrating and felt he had broken promises to Polanski.

The victim, Samantha Geimer, has long advocated that the case be dismissed or that Polanski be sentenced in absentia. She went so far as as to travel from her home in Hawaii to Los Angeles five years ago to urge a judge to end “a 40-year sentence which has been imposed on the victim of a crime as well as the perpetrator.”

Samantha Geimer pictured here entering a Los Angeles courthouse on 9 June 2017.
Samantha Geimer pictured here entering a Los Angeles courthouse on 9 June 2017. AFP

“I implore you to consider taking action to finally bring this matter to a close as an act of mercy to myself and my family,” Geimer said.

The Associated Press does not typically name victims of sex abuse, but Geimer went public years ago and wrote a memoir titled “The Girl: A Life in the Shadow of Roman Polanski.” The cover features a photo shot by Polanski.

Polanski agreed to pay Geimer over $600,000 to settle a lawsuit in 1993.

Long running saga

Geimer, who has pressed for investigation of judicial misconduct, asked that the transcript be unsealed and in a letter last month urged the DA’s office to take a fresh look at the case.

Prosecutors have consistently objected to releasing the material but relented earlier this week to honor Geimer’s wishes and be transparent with the public.

“This case has been described by the courts as ‘one of the longest-running sagas in California criminal justice history,’” Gascón said in a statement. “For years, this office has fought the release of information that the victim and public have a right to know."

However, the DA did not indicate that Polanski would be able to avoid a court appearance. The press release said Polanski remains a fugitive and should surrender to the court for sentencing.

(With AP)

Daily newsletterReceive essential international news every morning

Keep up to date with international news by downloading the RFI app

Share :
Page not found

The content you requested does not exist or is not available anymore.